- From: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
- Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2006 20:29:15 +0200
- To: "Christophe Strobbe" <christophe.strobbe@esat.kuleuven.be>, public-wai-ert@w3.org
On Thu, 30 Mar 2006 17:26:17 +0200, Christophe Strobbe <christophe.strobbe@esat.kuleuven.be> wrote: > However, take a look at CP 3.3: "Use style sheets to control layout and > presentation." > Every user agent has a built-in stylesheet or presentation, so you could > argue that the content always passes the checkpoint even if the developer > fails process-wise. > (WCAG 1.0's definition of style sheets says that they may be "built into > user agents" [1].) This is closer to on-topic. In this case, if you made no effort to say anything about presentation, you would IMHO pass. But if you use a layout table, or a couple of <big> elements, you fail. (I have a pretty plain-english interpretation - there is a legal term in Anglo-Saxon law called "a reasonable person" which is "the average man on the Clapham omnibus". The average man on the Clapham omnibus is a pretty straight-talking no-nonsense kind of a bloke still....) cheers Chaals -- Charles McCathieNevile chaals@opera.com hablo español - je parle français - jeg lærer norsk Peek into the kitchen: http://snapshot.opera.com/
Received on Thursday, 30 March 2006 18:29:14 UTC