Re: more discussion on warnings in EARL

On Tue, 19 Dec 2006 17:15:52 +0530, Carlos Iglesias  
<carlos.iglesias@fundacionctic.org> wrote:

...
>> Another possibility would be to make earl:warning a
>> sub-property of dc:description and then use it in an
>> earl:TestResult instead of dc:description.
>
> Maybe in adition, but not instead because we may want other descriptions  
> non related to warnings.

If itis a sub-property then you can use both, which is what we should  
enable IMHO.

cheers

Chaals

-- 
   Charles McCathieNevile, Opera Software: Standards Group
   hablo español  -  je parle français  -  jeg lærer norsk
chaals@opera.com          Try Opera 9 now! http://opera.com