- From: Johannes Koch <johannes.koch@fit.fraunhofer.de>
- Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 16:22:12 +0100
- To: public-wai-ert@w3.org
Carlos Iglesias schrieb:
>> earl:TestResult rdf:ID="result1"
>> |-earl:validity: earl:pass
>> |- dc:title: Media Type test
>> |- dc:description: text/html is an allowed, but not
>> recommended media type.
>>
>> earl:TestResult rdf:ID="resultN"
>> |-earl:validity: earl:pass"
>> |- dc:title: Content Format Support
>> |- dc:description: The content format support is OK
>
> The problem with this representation is that you have the "warning advise" at the atomic test level, not at the overall test outcome (the CONTENT_FORMAT_SUPPORT test)
So the validity for the testable CONTENT_FORMAT_SUPPORT_mediaTypeMarkup
(sub-test) is earl:fail:
earl:Assertion rdf:ID="assertion1"
|- earl:testable CONTENT_FORMAT_SUPPORT_mediaTypeMarkup
|- earl:result
|- earl:TestResult rdf:ID="result1"
|- earl:validity: earl:fail
|- earl:instance -> PointerCollection1
|- dc:title: Media Type test
|- dc:description: text/html is an allowed, but not
recommended media type.
and the validity for the testable CONTENT_FORMAT_SUPPORT (super-test) is
earl:pass:
earl:Assertion rdf:ID="assertionN"
|- earl:testable CONTENT_FORMAT_SUPPORT
|- earl:result
|- earl:TestResult rdf:ID="resultN"
|- earl:validity: earl:pass
|- earl:instance -> PointerCollection1
|- dc:title: Content Format Support
|- dc:description: The content format support is OK
|- earl:warning: text/html is an allowed, but not recommended
media type.
Is that what you think?
--
Johannes Koch - Competence Center BIKA
Fraunhofer Institute for Applied Information Technology (FIT.LIFE)
Schloss Birlinghoven, D-53757 Sankt Augustin, Germany
Phone: +49-2241-142628 Fax: +49-2241-142065
Received on Monday, 18 December 2006 15:23:00 UTC