- From: Carlos Iglesias <carlos.iglesias@fundacionctic.org>
- Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 17:31:26 +0100
- To: "Shadi Abou-Zahra" <shadi@w3.org>, <public-wai-ert@w3.org>
Hi group, My quick walkthrough: > 3. pick up on new listed issues > <http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/EARL10/issues> > - reconsider stability of foaf:Organisation I'm in favour of the adoption. > - consider renaming earl:validity I think "outcome" instead "validity" makes sense, the only problem I see is that the validity levels staff is one of the most stable and interoperable parts of EARL, nevertheless this new EARL is quite different to the previous one in several aspects and a break line could be necessary. > - consider stand-alone pointer vocabulary It makes sense if we want to make further adoption easier (WCL, TSD TF...) and if we expect the language to grow with new classes of pointers > - consider WCL "groups of resources" I think this is an interesting work that could be reused in EARL and should keep an eye on it but, what do you mean exactly with "wait for the WCL method for defining groups of resources unambiguously"? Regards, CI.
Received on Tuesday, 12 December 2006 16:32:02 UTC