- From: Nick Kew <nick@webthing.com>
- Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2005 16:44:28 +0100
- To: public-wai-ert@w3.org
On Monday 19 September 2005 18:42, Shadi Abou-Zahra wrote: > Hi, > > During the previous teleconference we decided to use the current "assertor > approach" for the location: we will not pre-define the location instance to > *always* be a bag but that it can be either single type or compound type > (where more than one trigger constitute one occurence of a result). > > Please find a quick draft below for discusion on tomorrow's call: > > > <rdfs:Class > rdf:about="http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/EARL/nmg-strawman#Location"> [chop] > <rdfs:Class > rdf:about="http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/EARL/nmg-strawman#singleLocator"> Hmmm. Zero or more of [ title, description, line, column, xpath, fuzzy] No mention of charoffset or byteoffset? CSS-selector? xpointer? And no mention of relationships: for example, a column without a line is nonsense, and line/columns must presumably come in pairs if there are more than one. Surely line/column should be treated as a pair, with the column being optional? And the concept of a *single* locator comprising (say) multiple titles, descriptions and xpaths is, erm, interesting. > <rdfs:Class > rdf:about="http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/EARL/nmg-strawman#compoundLocator"> [ title*, description*, Locator+ ] Again, should we be *that* flexible about numbers of titles/descriptions? -- Nick Kew
Received on Tuesday, 20 September 2005 15:51:11 UTC