W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-ert@w3.org > May 2005

Re: First Working Draft of EARL 1.0 Requirements

From: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 14:50:56 +0200
To: "public-wai-ert@w3.org" <public-wai-ert@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.srm4m62kwxe0ny@pc048.qadoc.oslo.opera.com>

Shadi was good enough to dig out my outstanding action items, so this is  
where I am up to:

On Mon, 30 May 2005 14:54:07 +0200, Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org> wrote:

> Items still open:
> <http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/2005/03/issues.html>
>  - Modify schema to accommodate types of subjects (products)
>     * CMN: chase karl and come up with a proposal

There was a proposal in the schema modifications proposal, and a  
disccussion after that, and I am happy about the results. I don't plan to  
continue this action item

>  - Conversion between current and newer EARL versions
>     * CMN: look into implementation for this functionality
> <http://www.w3.org/2005/05/03-er-minutes>
>  * cmn to look up how to define ID as required

I though I had done this. We have to make some special magic, or implement  
it outside RDF.

> <http://www.w3.org/2005/05/24-er-minutes>
>  * chaals dig out how to require some non-earl property in the earl  
> spec, using OWL

Same way you require an earl property using OWL. e.g. owl:Restriction,  
owl:someValuesFrom, ...

I plan to look at this when doing a new spec draft - i.e. at the point  
where we get to discussing what restrictions we might want.


Charles McCathieNevile                              chaals@opera.com
          hablo español - je parle français - jeg lærer norsk
   Here's one we prepared earlier:   http://www.opera.com/download
Received on Tuesday, 31 May 2005 12:51:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:52:49 UTC