- From: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 25 May 2005 17:27:36 +0200
- To: "public-wai-ert@w3.org" <public-wai-ert@w3.org>
Hi, Charles McCathieNevile wrote: > Sure. The proposed requirement was that they create their own namespace > for it, and not make up some property and put it in the EARL namespace. OK, got it. We were talking about the same thing all along, I might have not precised that in my initial message. However, this comes nearly for free when we specify a solid schema. Any vocabulary that claims to be in EARL (by using the namespace) but actually isn't can be easily identified. One issue down, 99.999 more to go ;) Cheers, Shadi -- Shadi Abou-Zahra, Web Accessibility Specialist for Europe World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), http://www.w3.org/ Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI), http://www.w3.org/WAI/ IST WAI-TIES Project (WAI-TIES) http://www.w3.org/WAI/TIES/ Evaluation and Repair Tools (ERT WG), http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/ 2004, Route des Lucioles BP93 - 06560 Sophia-Antipolis - France Voice: +33(0)4 92 38 50 64 Fax: +33(0)4 92 38 78 22
Received on Wednesday, 25 May 2005 15:27:33 UTC