Re: Schemas and schemata Re: earl message

OK, so it sounds like we are thinkng along the same lines... which is  
hopefully a good sign :-)

Yeah, when we are just producing EARL we do it according to what amounts  
to an XML schema. The trick is to check it is the right RDF (which I  
messed up with earl:message...)



On Mon, 02 May 2005 21:54:15 +0200, Chris Ridpath  
<> wrote:

>> Hmmm. You might mean XML schema here. Which is not at all what I think  
>> we
>> need
> I didn't mean an XML schema but was referring to an RDF schema.  
> Something we
> can use to ensure our EARL is OK. I think this should be a major part of  
> the
> EARL project.
>> I think trying to constrain EARL to an XML Schema should
>> not be a  goal of this group.
> Yes, I'm getting the message that we don't need an XML schema. However,  
> I'm
> going to create one for the EARL we generate to make sure it's what we
> expect it to be. This is for our use and may, or may not, be useful to
> others.
> Regards,
> Chris

Charles McCathieNevile                      Fundacion Sidar   +61 409 134 136

Received on Monday, 2 May 2005 20:44:16 UTC