- From: Giorgio Brajnik <giorgio@dimi.uniud.it>
- Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 16:36:08 +0200
- To: public-wai-ert@w3.org
I read with interest the list of use cases that Johannes produced. However, as I said during Shadi's presentation at CSUN, in my opinion EARL lacks a compelling business case, one that would lead vendors of evaluation tools to include EARL processing (import and/or export) into their tools. A possible way to increase market pressure on EARL could be the adoption, by WAI, of a new "accessibility conformity logo" to be put, by web developers, into the pages they produce to claim a certain level of accessibility (eg. wcag1.0 AA). Like the one that is usually linked to http://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG1A-Conformance.html.en . WAI should require that whoever posts the new logo, links it to a RSS-like feeder that yields an EARL report that justifies the claimed level of accessibility. [1] Perhaps in this way we could achieve 2 benefits: 1) increase market demand for earl reports 2) reduce the number of over-estimations of the conformance claims and logos. Howevere there are a number of hurdles to overcome, such as: - how to promote the use of the new logo and policy rather than the currently used one - how to determine what are the minimum properties (formal requirements) that EARL reports should have in order to be used as justification for accessibility claims - how to deal with availability of multiple earl reports for the same site/page - how to deal with accessibility assessments that were performed without usage of any tool [1] (Thank you, Wendy, for suggesting the RSS feeder.) Best regards, Giorgio Brajnik ______________________________________________________________________ Dip. di Matematica e Informatica | voice: +39 (0432) 55.8445 Università di Udine | fax: +39 (0432) 55.8499 Via delle Scienze, 206 | email: giorgio@dimi.uniud.it Loc. Rizzi -- 33100 Udine -- ITALY | http://www.dimi.uniud.it/giorgio
Received on Wednesday, 30 March 2005 14:36:21 UTC