- From: Nils Ulltveit-Moe <nils@u-moe.no>
- Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 11:06:18 +0100
- To: Johannes Koch <johannes.koch@fit.fraunhofer.de>
- Cc: public-wai-ert@w3.org
Hi Johannes EARL may also be useful for integrating test results from heterogenous systems in a standardised way. E.g. a test tool being able to run both JUnit, pyUnit and Tcl/expect based tests suites and integrate the EARL reports to show test coverage where several programming languages are used. Maybe also for testing interfaces against standards. (E.g. W3C generates EARL machine readable reports from the DOM test suite tests.) One thing that probably is holding back EARL adoption, is the lack of good libraries facilitating both easy generation of EARL reports and an easy call interface for performing the tests. This is maybe outside the scope of the ERT group, but is something we in the WAB cluster EU project will consider doing. A prototype test interface and library would be released under the W3C licence. Mvh. Nils Ulltveit-Moe ons, 23,.03.2005 kl. 10.00 +0100, skrev Johannes Koch: > Yesterday Gabriele asked me if EARL should only be used for > accessibility test results. I think EARL can be used for other tests, > too. What do you think? -- Nils Ulltveit-Moe <nils@u-moe.no>
Received on Wednesday, 23 March 2005 10:04:20 UTC