- From: Myriam Arrue <myriam@si.ehu.es>
- Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2005 16:31:55 +0100
- To: "Carlos Iglesias" <carlos.iglesias@fundacionctic.org>, <shadi@w3.org>
- Cc: <public-wai-ert@w3.org>
Hello, I also agree with Shadi. Talk to you later, Myriam ----- Original Message ----- From: "Carlos Iglesias" <carlos.iglesias@fundacionctic.org> To: <shadi@w3.org> Cc: <public-wai-ert@w3.org> Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2005 4:14 PM Subject: RE: Audience (was Brainstorm of EARL Requirements) > > > Completely agree. > > Regards, > > Carlos Iglesias. > > > -----Mensaje original----- > > De: public-wai-ert-request@w3.org > > [mailto:public-wai-ert-request@w3.org] En nombre de Shadi Abou-Zahra > > Enviado el: martes, 08 de marzo de 2005 11:13> > > > Here I am referring to the "EARL Primer" rather than the > > "EARL Technical Specification". I think there are some > > developers who only want to output EARL and quite frankly > > hardly care if it is RDF/XML or a comma delimited file; they > > just want to know the strings they need to generate. Then > > there are others who want to read EARL reports and process > > them in some form; I think they may want to know more details > > such as subclassing entities and so on. Our examples should > > reflect these use cases (for the specification) and talk to > > these developers. Do you agree with that? > > > > Regards, > > Shadi > > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 8 March 2005 15:23:41 UTC