Re: Agenda for F2F at TP

Hey Chaals,

> Is there a plan for the EO group to join us at some point, or just to read 
> our minutes or something? (It says we'll get feedack from them, but it 
> isn't clear how).

Thursday 15:30 - 17:00 is a joint meeting with the Education and Outreach Working Group (EOWG).

My idea was that we present the EARL scenarios which we developed in the morning to EO, and get some feedback (live discussion). Since EOWG develops and maintains the "Evaluating Web Sites" document, my hope is that they can help identify gaps in our scenarios and requirements.


> Please tell me we don't have to eat lunch in the meeting room :-) (I know 
> we don't - we can go out and eat dirty snow, as such ingratitude deserves 
> :-)

No. In fact, I think we may not eat in the meeting rooms. Lunch is served somewhere but I still have to find out exactly where and how. I'll post the information on the Web site as soon as I have it.


> Does the fact that test descriptions are seperate mean that they are not 
> in scope for the general requirements discussion? (Makes sense to me, 
> actually...)

As you know, EARL does not describe test cases itself but implicitly it bears some basic assumptions about how tests are described. For example, the current spec assumes that each test description has a (publicly available) URI.

So idea for this session is to spend some time refining these assumptions. Maybe developing some really rough requirements for test case descriptions. After that we can look back at our EARL requirements and tweak them accordingly if necessary.

Regards,
  Shadi

Received on Sunday, 27 February 2005 23:54:11 UTC