- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@sidar.org>
- Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 01:42:57 +0100
- To: "Andrew Kirkpatrick" <andrew_kirkpatrick@wgbh.org>, public-wai-ert@w3.org
Andrew is quite right about this. There was even some discussion on the old er-ig list - see for example the thread starting http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-er-ig/2004Apr/thread.html#6 - but I disagree that it is difficult to make this list. For common tests where the rule is published, such as the ones Chris has developed, the publisher of the test can provide a URI for it, and voila. (I guess I should try to provide english decriptions of the automatic tests hera does - at the moment we only have this stuff in spanish, which is useful for ourselves but not to the working group). If, for example, I find a test that some tool does, and can't find a URI used to identify it, there is nothing that stops me from making one up. If another person makes up a different one for the same thing, then we realise we should have looked around and talked about things first, but the technical solution is the OWL property sameAs - which it is probably useful to have implemented in any system that reads EARL. (At some point I will start a thread on implementing OWL properties in EARL parsers - I think this is an important thing to do for a few properties, although I don't think a full OWL parser will be necessary for most applications I can imagine). Cheers Chaals On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 14:14:32 -0500, Andrew Kirkpatrick <andrew_kirkpatrick@wgbh.org> wrote: > >> One of the main objective of EARL is to combine different tools' >> evaluation results in order to compare them. Another important feature >> of EARL is that it can be used for exchanging data between tools. > > I agree with this as a good objective. Comparing results between tools > won't be possible until there is a defined list of tests that the tools > can reference. It is possible to reference issues by the WCAG > guideline, but the actual tests occur at a much more fine-grained level > (e.g. alt missing from an image that is in a link that contains other > text is more specific than 'images must have alt'). > > Getting this list is very important, and difficult. > > AWK > -- Charles McCathieNevile - Vice Presidente - Fundacion Sidar charles@sidar.org http://www.sidar.org (chaals is available for consulting at the moment)
Received on Monday, 21 February 2005 00:56:39 UTC