- From: Chris Ridpath <chris.ridpath@utoronto.ca>
- Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2005 09:08:47 -0500
- To: "Paul Walsh" <paul.walsh@segalamtest.com>, "'WAI ER IG List'" <public-wai-ert@w3.org>
- Cc: <sorchamoore@segalamtest.com>, <davidrooks@segalamtest.com>
Paul, > I have a problem with some of the wording in > the Introduction section. > This is still very much draft text and most of it was lifted from the techniques document http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-WCAG20-HTML-TECHS-20050630/ ----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul Walsh" <paul.walsh@segalamtest.com> To: "'Chris Ridpath'" <chris.ridpath@utoronto.ca>; "'WAI ER IG List'" <public-wai-ert@w3.org> Cc: <sorchamoore@segalamtest.com>; <davidrooks@segalamtest.com> Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2005 8:41 PM Subject: RE: Accessibility Test Suite > Chris, > > I have a problem with some of the wording in the Introduction section. > The following text has been taken from the first paragraph; "This test > suite represents the best thinking of the Web Content Accessibility > Guidelines Working Group and as such is the only method for testing > conformance to WCAG 2.0. > > The contents of this document is *not* the *only* method for testing > conformance to WCAG 2.0. As a conformance specialist and 10 years > experience in test management of Web sites and technologies, I strongly > disagree with your statement. Therefore, I would like to propose the > following text: "This test suite represents the best thinking of the Web > Content Accessibility Guidelines Working Group and as such is the > *recommended approach* for testing conformance to WCAG 2.0. > > It's not important to give reasons why I hold this opinion, as you can't > profess to know the 'only' method to validate anything. I'm sure this > was an oversight, but thought I'd bring it to your attention. If only I > had time to read the rest of the document! :) > > My team is busy building lots of good stuff that you will soon hear > about (possibly use), so resource is tight - although Sorcha and/or > David will gladly help with document reviews. > > Thanks, > Paul > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: public-wai-ert-request@w3.org > [mailto:public-wai-ert-request@w3.org] On > Behalf Of Chris Ridpath > Sent: 06 December 2005 20:01 > To: WAI ER IG List > Subject: Accessibility Test Suite > > > On tomorrow's telecon [1] I'd like to give an overview of the > accessibility > test suite that we've been working on. > > The test suite can currently be found at: > http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG20/tests/ > > The test suite can be used to test HTML content for conformance to > accessibility guidelines like the WCAG. It's not WCAG specific > though and > can be used on other accessibility guidelines like 508 as well. > > One of the problems with current accessibility guidelines is that > they are > open to interpretation and we all interpret the guidelines > differently. One > tool may claim that a page fails the guideline while another tool > claims > that it passes. The test suite is designed to remove this > ambiguity and > create a standard that can be used by all. > > I'll give an overview of how the test suite was developed and how > it may be > used by other tool creators in the group. > > Cheers, > Chris > > [1] > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert/2005Dec/0008.html > > > >
Received on Friday, 9 December 2005 14:10:13 UTC