- From: Johannes Koch <johannes.koch@fit.fraunhofer.de>
- Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2005 13:24:14 +0200
- To: public-wai-ert@w3.org
Charles McCathieNevile wrote: [HTML WCAG 2.0 test 48] > Yes, but it is not the ERT groups place to tell WCAG what it should be > testing for. Only how to test it. 1. Where does the WCAG WG say, that it is only the lang attribute you have to test for? 2. I think, whether to include @xml:lang where appropriate into the test, would be the responsibility of this joint task force. Do you think it's only WCAG Techniques TF responsibility? 3. The HTML Techniques and the HTML test suite cover HTML and XHTML 1.0, as mentioned in the Abstract, not e.g. XHTML 1.1, XHTML Basic 1.0 or even XHTML 2.0, although, the procedure for test 48 mentions "XHTML 1.1 or higher". So either the test suite is about HTML, XHTML 1.0 and upwards, then the procedure should be rephrased to "4. If the content is XHTML based on XHTML modularization ..." (which would include XHTML Basic 1.0), or the fourth item should be removed. -- Johannes Koch - Competence Center BIKA Fraunhofer Institute for Applied Information Technology (FIT.LIFE) Schloss Birlinghoven, D-53757 Sankt Augustin, Germany Phone: +49-2241-142628
Received on Monday, 8 August 2005 11:24:54 UTC