- From: Johannes Koch <johannes.koch@fit.fraunhofer.de>
- Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2005 10:26:06 +0200
- To: public-wai-ert@w3.org
Shadi Abou-Zahra wrote: > * WCAG 2.0 conformance claims seem to disregard content negotiation > * proposal: conformance claim on URI implies all its delivery units > * ...otherwise claims should be made only on specific delivery units > * ACTION: Johannes will draft proposal and send to ERT for feedback IMO content negotiation deals with a negotiating process between client and server to decide which of a limited number of versions the server should send to the client. The content provider is responsible for all of the provided versions and so should also be responsible for their accessibility. So a conformance claim with a URI for a negotiated resource must cover all possible versions of the content. This does not cover personalized content, where the number of versions are unlimited (at least sort of). IMHO this is a different topic. -- Johannes Koch - Competence Center BIKA Fraunhofer Institute for Applied Information Technology (FIT.LIFE) Schloss Birlinghoven, D-53757 Sankt Augustin, Germany Phone: +49-2241-142628
Received on Monday, 1 August 2005 08:26:32 UTC