- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@sidar.org>
- Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 00:33:56 +1000
- To: "public-wai-ert@w3.org" <public-wai-ert@w3.org>
Hi folks, in the current EARL spec there are results which look like the following: <earl:result rdf:parseType="Resource"> <earl:validity rdf:resource="&earl;fail"/> <earl:confidence rdf:resource="&earl;high"/> <earl:message>malformed element in line 23</earl:message> </earl:result> This makes it possible to put two result on the same Assertion - for example to assert that they have a different probability, or the assertor has a different level of conidence in them. <earl:result rdf:parseType="Resource"> <earl:validity rdf:resource="&earl;notApplicable"/> <earl:confidence rdf:resource="&earl;low"/> <earl:message>malformed element in line 23</earl:message> </earl:result> I am not sure if we want to maintain this possibility, but it provides a feasible explanation of what I was copying when I wrote up my examples for "EARL by example" [1], and it is how Hera currently produces EARL. Any thoughts? cheers Chaals [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/Europe/talks/200311-earl/all -- Charles McCathieNevile Fundacion Sidar charles@sidar.org +61 409 134 136 http://www.sidar.org
Received on Wednesday, 13 April 2005 14:34:47 UTC