- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@sidar.org>
- Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 10:58:58 +1000
- To: "public-wai-ert@w3.org" <public-wai-ert@w3.org>
Hi folks in most of the examples we have created so far of tests on pages we have said they are <earl:reprOf rdf:resource="something..." /> I think this isn't right, since we are still talking about rdf resources, and although it is handy that they have the same syntax as a URI that browsers use to fetch pages they are not necessarily the same. I think what we mean is The subject is a reprouction of the page found at http://example.org on X date. Optionally, we might also want to say (some of) As fetched with the following HTTP request and response headers, giving the following document source, which led to fetching the followig copies of linked resources... So for the basic case I think we should have <earl:WebContent rdf:about="#subject> <earl:reprOf rdf:parseType="Resource"> <dc:location rdf:datatype="&xsd;URI">http://www.example.org/</dc:location> <dc:date rdf:datatype="&xsd;gDateTime">2005-04-04T23:00:00+1100</dc:date> for the optional stuff we might just be able to use the annotea body directly, since it decribes a resource fetched by http... <a:body> ...some http stuff, maybe a document itself, ... although we might need to look carefully at the properties annotea uses to describe HTTP exchange since I think they are completely undocumented. And if we want to note the images, scripts, stylesheets etc we probably need to define some more stuff too, or steal it from somewhere else. Note that all this only applies to one type of subject - specifications, tools, cars and cats are just other types of -- Charles McCathieNevile Fundacion Sidar charles@sidar.org +61 409 134 136 http://www.sidar.org
Received on Wednesday, 13 April 2005 00:59:36 UTC