RE: ERT Action Item: Use Case Scenarios for EARL

 
Hi Shadi, see below.

> -----Mensaje original-----
> De: public-wai-ert-request@w3.org 
> [mailto:public-wai-ert-request@w3.org] En nombre de Shadi Abou-Zahra
> Enviado el: lunes, 04 de abril de 2005 18:53
> Para: public-wai-ert@w3.org
> Asunto: Re: ERT Action Item: Use Case Scenarios for EARL
> 
> 
> Hi Carlos,
> 
> > A - Just a claim that says "This page is accesible for people with 
> > cognitive disabilities".
> > 
> > B - Detailed info about the WCAG checkpoints the page conforms.
> > 
> > IMO the answer is A. Do you think that most of the people with 
> > disabilities know the WCAG?
> 
> What about if browsers would support the user preferences 
> such as "do not display pages with flickering content" or 
> "use high contrast style sheets for pages with low color contrast"?
> 
> That means that the EARL reports and WCAG checkpoints (or 
> even tests) are not directly visible to the end-users. Wendy 
> made the analogy to RSS which is a transparent, 
> machine-readable technology.

Perfect. That was what I mean, wathever you use it should be completely
transparent to the end-users.

Regards,

CI.

Received on Tuesday, 5 April 2005 10:30:27 UTC