Hi Paul, > From what I can see of this suggested process, it does not appear > to incorporate the human interaction which is necessary for the > validation of any accessible website. Actually, while EARL is intended to be machine-readable, it simplifies merging the results which are generated by tools and the ones which are manually evaluated by humans into one repository. I think we all in the group agree that no single tool is able to evaluate all accessibility checkpoints automatically. Do you feel a specific Use Case scenario to address that is missing? Regards, ShadiReceived on Monday, 4 April 2005 16:38:46 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:52:49 UTC