RE: ERT Action Item: Use Case Scenarios for EARL

Hi Paul,

> From what I can see of this suggested process, it does not appear 
> to incorporate the human interaction which is necessary for the 
> validation of any accessible website. 

Actually, while EARL is intended to be machine-readable, it simplifies
merging the results which are generated by tools and the ones which are
manually evaluated by humans into one repository. I think we all in the
group agree that no single tool is able to evaluate all accessibility
checkpoints automatically.

Do you feel a specific Use Case scenario to address that is missing?


Received on Monday, 4 April 2005 16:38:46 UTC