RE: ERT Action Item: Use Case Scenarios for EARL from Shadi Abou-Zahra on 2005-04-04 (public-wai-ert@w3.org from April 2005)

From: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 18:38:50 +0200
To: "'Paul Walsh'" <paulwalsh@segalamtest.com>, <public-wai-ert@w3.org>
Message-ID: <002f01c53934$ca6b9d20$be5b80d9@K2>

Hi Paul,

> From what I can see of this suggested process, it does not appear 
> to incorporate the human interaction which is necessary for the 
> validation of any accessible website. 

Actually, while EARL is intended to be machine-readable, it simplifies
merging the results which are generated by tools and the ones which are
manually evaluated by humans into one repository. I think we all in the
group agree that no single tool is able to evaluate all accessibility
checkpoints automatically.

Do you feel a specific Use Case scenario to address that is missing?

Regards,
  Shadi

Received on Monday, 4 April 2005 16:38:46 UTC