- From: Carlos Iglesias <carlos.iglesias@fundacionctic.org>
- Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 10:38:08 +0200
- To: "Charles McCathieNevile" <charles@sidar.org>, <public-wai-ert@w3.org>
> -----Mensaje original----- > De: Charles McCathieNevile [mailto:charles@sidar.org] > Enviado el: domingo, 03 de abril de 2005 6:21 > Para: Carlos Iglesias; public-wai-ert@w3.org > Asunto: Complexity > > RDF isn't that new (it's only been around for about 6 years > in roughly its current form), nor terribly complex. This > argument is similar, I think, to the argument that XHTML is > to complex because braile translation software does not deal > with it at all - the fact is that the small market for > braille translation has been focussed on the much more > complex Microsoft Word format, and their support for HTML is > based on an understanding of HTML that is about 10 years old. I have never said that RDF is a new technology nor terrible complex, I just said that it's not well known and SEEMS complex for the people. > Shadi has often noted that there is not a lot of RDF > expertise _in this group_ - So, you're saying that I'm right, because I'm sure that there's is a lot of Evaluation and Repair tools expertise _in this group_ and, if there is not a lot of RDF expertise, there is the best proof that RDF is not well known. > I have > seen many developers simply assume that it is very very > difficult, and thus make an ill-informed choice. So, again, you're saying that I'm right. RDF SEEMS complex for the people. Regards, CI -------------------------------------- Carlos Iglesias Moro Fundación CTIC Parque Científico-Tecnológico de Gijón 33203 - Gijón, Asturias, España teléfono: +34 984291212 fax: +34 984390612 email: carlos.iglesias@fundacionctic.org URL: http://www.fundacionctic.org
Received on Monday, 4 April 2005 08:38:49 UTC