- From: Johannes Koch <johannes.koch@fit.fraunhofer.de>
- Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2005 15:35:35 +0200
- To: public-wai-ert@w3.org
Charles McCathieNevile wrote: > I think we should adopt the Annotea approach of having a property that > talks about the location within a test subject of a particular failure, > but I don't thin that this should be part of the message, rather a > property of the assertion itself. So the full statement would be > > Assertion > subject #foo > location #pointer(somewhere) > testcase #bar > result Fail > ... > > Assertion > subject #foo > location #pointer(elsewhere) > testcase #bar > result Fail > ... > > If we collapse these together to give > > Assertion > subject #foo > location #pointer(somewhere) > location #pointer(elsewhere) > testcase #bar > result Fail > ... For me an assertion is about whether a subject passes a test. If I say, the subject is the whole resource, than there should only be one assertion containing multiple locations. If OTOH I say, the subject is e.g. the markup element, then there should be two assertions containing one location each. -- Johannes Koch - Competence Center BIKA Fraunhofer Institute for Applied Information Technology (FIT.LIFE) Schloss Birlinghoven, D-53757 Sankt Augustin, Germany Phone: +49-2241-142628
Received on Friday, 1 April 2005 13:37:23 UTC