- From: Tim Boland <frederick.boland@nist.gov>
- Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 09:47:26 -0400
- To: public-wai-ert-tsdtf@w3.org
Some Comments/Questions on content-structure-separation-programmatic_001: ------------beginning of comments------------------- For "purpose" tag in metadata file, how does one know that blockquote is used for indentation.. can't test "intent" "to be used for formatting"? However, if you still want to test for "intent", maybe make it a little more obvious, like (markup quoted) "p"Chapter 1"/p", "blockquote"Section 1.1"/blockquote", "blockquote"Section 1.2"/blockquote", etc. When executing testfile, can't tell if "Section A" is actually indented with respect to left margin (did indentation work?).. From "HTML4.01" - "visual user agents generally render "blockquote" as an indented block", but doesn't seem to be a normative requirement.. In "title" of testfile, change "it from" to "it for" in place - "blockquote" "p" "/p" "/blockquote" is a legitimate example in HTML4.01. HTML4.01 also says that "blockquote" is to be used for long quotations. How is blockquote misused (with respect to what standard - according to HTML4.01 indentation is correct most of the time, but this is not a long quotation - need more specifics as to how misused?) Do we want to give advice as to how to indent properly (upon failure, it may be nice to show how to do it properly - I think this is referenced in TestFAQ Question 9 - "How Should Tests Report Their Outcome? - http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/2005/01/test-faq#report ) I ran metadata file through W3C validator and got "well-formed XML - 1 warning", and testfile was "valid XHTML1.0 strict" Still have a question about use of "resources" ater "testfile" in directory path (but may be accessing older copy of metadata file) Still have a question about id attribute under "test case description" tag - don't see that in metadata file (but may be accessing older copy of metadata file) In metadata document, "expected result" is supposed to occur before "rule" but after "rules" - an attribute of "rules" - but "expectedresult" occurs as an attribute of "locations" in the metadata file (but may be accessing older copy of metadata file) Still would be nice to have the title of the technique rather than "F43" (no semantic meaning, and numbers could change, but maybe this has been discussed already? Still would be nice to have the title of the success criterion rather than "sc1.3.1" (no semantic meaning, and numbers could change, but maybe this has been discussed already? -----------------------end of comments-------------------------------- Thanks and best wishes Tim Boland NIST
Received on Monday, 23 June 2008 13:48:20 UTC