Re: TSD TF: Agenda for teleconference on Tuesday 5 February 2008

Regrets - conflicting meeting..

Best, Tim Boland NIST

At 10:53 PM 2/1/2008 +0100, you wrote:

>Dear TSD TF participants,
>
>Next Monday is a holiday at K.U.Leuven, hence the early agenda.
>
>
>The next teleconference is scheduled for Tuesday 5 February 2008
>from 13:30 to 14:30 UTC:
>    * 05:30 to 08:30 North American Pacific Time (PST)
>    * 08:30 to 09:30 North American Eastern Time (EST)
>    * 14:30 to 15:30 Central European Summer Time (CEST)
>    * 23:30 to 00:30 (Wednesday) Australian Eastern Time
>
>Please check the World Clock Meeting Planner(s) to find out the precise
>date for your own time zone:
>     <http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meeting.html>
>
>
>Next on the scribe rotation list is: Tim (?)
>     <http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/scribes#scribes-tsd>
>
>
>The teleconference information is:
>    * +1-617-761-6200 (US), +33.4.89.06.34.99 (France),
>      +44.117.370.6152 (UK)
>    * Passcode 8783 ("TSTF")
>    * IRC server irc.w3.org port 6665 channel #tsdtf
>
>
>AGENDA:
>
>1. Next steps for current repository content: update first?
>    We currently have almost 200 test samples that were created for older 
> WCAG 2.0 working drafts (April 2006 or May 2007). Should we update them 
> before we continue reviewing them?
>
>2. Review of test samples
>    See the issues that came out of Tim's reviews:
> 
><http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert-tsdtf/2008Jan/0009.html>
>
>3. API test tool technique & WCAG test procedures
>    An issue raised by Cynthia Shelly (in CC of this mail) during the last 
> WCAG telecon: some new techniques contain a test procedure that relies on 
> tools for inspecting accessibility interfaces.
>
>4. Naming convention and test suite ID in metadata
>     See
><http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert-tsdtf/2007Dec/0000.html>
>    - pending action 
> <http://www.w3.org/2008/01/08-tsdtf-minutes.html#action04>:
>      CS send summary of the ID/naming/referencing mechanism of the tests,
>      and collect the open issues (or previously discussed issues that were
>      not ideally resolved)
>
>5. Review of action items
>    The first one needs to be reassigned; some of the others may be 
> getting stale:
>     * test cases without a technique/failure mapping:
>       - action item: 
> <http://www.w3.org/2007/10/30-tsdtf-minutes.html#action01>
>     * test samples ready for review: see reviewers 03 through 10 at
>       - action items:
>         <http://www.w3.org/2007/10/30-tsdtf-minutes.html#action03>
>         <http://www.w3.org/2007/10/30-tsdtf-minutes.html#action04>
>         <http://www.w3.org/2007/10/30-tsdtf-minutes.html#action05>
>(discussed 04 Dec 2007)
>         <http://www.w3.org/2007/10/30-tsdtf-minutes.html#action07>
>         <http://www.w3.org/2007/10/30-tsdtf-minutes.html#action06>
>
>
>Best regards,
>
>Carlos Velasco and Christophe Strobbe
>
>
>
>--
>Christophe Strobbe
>K.U.Leuven - Dept. of Electrical Engineering - SCD
>Research Group on Document Architectures
>Kasteelpark Arenberg 10 bus 2442
>B-3001 Leuven-Heverlee
>BELGIUM
>tel: +32 16 32 85 51
>http://www.docarch.be/
>
>Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm
>
>

Received on Monday, 4 February 2008 14:33:41 UTC