audio/video (not) listed in metadata - volunteers wanted

Hi,

One of the issues that showed up in the last round of structure 
reviews is that audio or video formats used in test samples are not 
always listed in the metadata.
If the audio or video is essential for the test sample (and this is 
always the case in our current test samples), the format needs to be 
listed in the "technology" section, for example:

   <recommendation 
xlink:href="http://www.microsoft.com/windows/windowsmedia/forpros/codecs/video.aspx">
       <label>Windows Media Video</label>
   </recommendation>

The video formats currently in use are wmv (Windows Media Video) and 
mov (QuickTime; this QuickTime movie is embedded in a SMIL file 
referenced by the test file).
The audio formats currently in use are wma (Windows Media Audio) and 
mid (MIDI). (Just three test cases with audio.)

I would like to call for a few volunteers to check the test samples 
(e.g. one or two formats per person; because we use the same naming 
convention for metadata, test files and additional resources, one 
only needs to look at the names of the audio/video files to find out 
which metadata files need checking; they all start with 'sc1.2.' or 
with 'sc1.4.') and add the metadata where needed.

Best regards,

Christophe


---
Please don't invite me to LinkedIn, Facebook, Quechup or other 
"social networks". You may have agreed to their "privacy policy", but 
I haven't.

-- 
Christophe Strobbe
K.U.Leuven - Dept. of Electrical Engineering - SCD
Research Group on Document Architectures
Kasteelpark Arenberg 10 bus 2442
B-3001 Leuven-Heverlee
BELGIUM
tel: +32 16 32 85 51
http://www.docarch.be/ 


Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm

Received on Tuesday, 29 April 2008 13:46:43 UTC