- From: Christophe Strobbe <christophe.strobbe@esat.kuleuven.be>
- Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 10:51:07 +0100
- To: public-wai-ert-tsdtf@w3.org
Hi Drew, Thanks for this. At 23:00 12/11/2007, Andrew LaHart wrote: >Re: Action item: ><http://www.w3.org/2007/10/30-tsdtf-minutes.html#action01>http://www.w3.org/2007/10/30-tsdtf-minutes.html#action01, >Here is the updated mapping information for the 4 tests. Because >"failed tests" do not currently map to techniques, only the last >test has an associated technique: > >* sc1.2.5_l3_001: > - XML: > <<http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/tests/xhtml/metadata/sc1.2.5_l3_001.xml>http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/tests/xhtml/metadata/sc1.2.5_l3_001.xml> > - test file: ><<http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/tests/xhtml/testfiles/sc1.2.5_l3_001.html>http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/tests/xhtml/testfiles/sc1.2.5_l3_001.html> > ><AJL> >No associated WCAG 2.0 technique because this is intended to fail. >Do not update the XML with a <technique id...> or <location >techrefs...> attribute. ></AJL> > > >* sc1.2.7_l3_001: > - XML: > <<http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/tests/xhtml/metadata/sc1.2.7_l3_001.xml>http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/tests/xhtml/metadata/sc1.2.7_l3_001.xml> > - test file: ><<http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/tests/xhtml/testfiles/sc1.2.7_l3_001.html>http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/tests/xhtml/testfiles/sc1.2.7_l3_001.html> > ><AJL> >No associated WCAG 2.0 technique because this is intended to fail. >Do not update the XML with a <technique id...> or <location >techrefs...> attribute. ></AJL> > >* sc1.2.7_l3_002: > - XML: > <<http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/tests/xhtml/metadata/sc1.2.7_l3_002.xml>http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/tests/xhtml/metadata/sc1.2.7_l3_002.xml> > - test file: ><<http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/tests/xhtml/testfiles/sc1.2.7_l3_002.html>http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/tests/xhtml/testfiles/sc1.2.7_l3_002.html> > ><AJL> >No associated WCAG 2.0 technique because this is intended to fail. >Do not update the XML with a <technique id...> or <location >techrefs...> attribute. ></AJL> > >* sc1.2.7_l3_003: > - XML: > <<http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/tests/xhtml/metadata/sc1.2.7_l3_003.xml>http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/tests/xhtml/metadata/sc1.2.7_l3_003.xml> > - test file: ><<http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/tests/xhtml/testfiles/sc1.2.7_l3_003.html>http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/tests/xhtml/testfiles/sc1.2.7_l3_003.html> > ><AJL> >Note: There are 2 techniques that this test samples applies to. I >know we can space delimited lists of technique ID's in the techrefs >attribute of the location element, but should we create multiple >technique elements for multiple entries? In general, when a test case is intended to address multiple techniques, we create multiple technique elements. (For an example, see the second example at <http://bentoweb.org/refs/TCDL2.0.html#linking-locations-techniques>.) This is often necessary when Understanding WCAG 2.0 says something like Gxx: Providing..., using one of the following techniques ... (i.e. a general technique + a more specific technique). sc1.2.7_l3_003 appears to be an example of this, so I would create technique elements for both G58 and G69. >Associated WCAG 2.0 techniques: ><http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-WCAG20-TECHS-20070517/#G58>http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-WCAG20-TECHS-20070517/#G58 > >http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-WCAG20-TECHS-20070517/#G69 > >Update XML with the following: >@@<technique id="G58" >xlink:href="<http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-WCAG20-TECHS-20070517/#G58>http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-WCAG20-TECHS-20070517/#G58"/> > >AND >@@<technique id="G69" >xlink:href="<http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-WCAG20-TECHS-20070517/#G69>http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-WCAG20-TECHS-20070517/#G69"/> >AND >@@<location techrefs="G58 G69"> ><AJL> I have implemented these changes. Best regards, Christophe >Thanks >Drew >Andrew LaHart >IBM Human Ability and Accessibility Center >w3.ibm.com/able -- Christophe Strobbe K.U.Leuven - Dept. of Electrical Engineering - SCD Research Group on Document Architectures Kasteelpark Arenberg 10 bus 2442 B-3001 Leuven-Heverlee BELGIUM tel: +32 16 32 85 51 http://www.docarch.be/ Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm
Received on Tuesday, 13 November 2007 09:51:26 UTC