- From: Christophe Strobbe <christophe.strobbe@esat.kuleuven.be>
- Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 10:51:39 +0200
- To: TSDTF <public-wai-ert-tsdtf@w3.org>
Hi, As you may know, XPath 2.0 [1] became a W3C Recommendation in January 2007. The current TCDL 2.0 spec was mostly written before that time and only references XPath 1.0: "The xpath attribute type specifies the location of an issue by means of an XPath expression as defined in XPath 1.0." [2] Would there be any objections against allowing XPath 2.0? According to the abstract of the XPath 2.0 spec, XPath 2.0 is a superset of XPath 1.0, so there would be no need to make immediate changes; it would just give us a more powerful expression language when we need it. [1] <http://www.w3.org/TR/xpath20/> [2] <http://bentoweb.org/refs/TCDL2.0.html#edef-location> Best regards, Christophe -- Christophe Strobbe K.U.Leuven - Dept. of Electrical Engineering - SCD Research Group on Document Architectures Kasteelpark Arenberg 10 bus 2442 B-3001 Leuven-Heverlee BELGIUM tel: +32 16 32 85 51 http://www.docarch.be/ Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm
Received on Wednesday, 13 June 2007 08:51:58 UTC