- From: Carlos Iglesias <carlos.iglesias@fundacionctic.org>
- Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2007 15:24:37 +0100
- To: "Christophe Strobbe" <christophe.strobbe@esat.kuleuven.be>, <public-wai-ert-tsdtf@w3.org>
Hi Christophe, > >- Use of a couple of properties (complexity and > >rule) that are part of TCDL but not of TS Metadata. > > rule is OK. It is actually essential. Yes, my fault. I meant the primary attribute of the rule element. > I propose that we add "complexity" to the > metadata documentation at > <http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/tests/usingTCDL>, e.g. > requiring that complexity is always atomic. > See previous threads starting from > <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert- > tsdtf/2007Mar/0027.html> > and > <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert- > tsdtf/2007Apr/0013.html>. I can live with the existence of primary and complexity attributes with the "atomic" and "yes" value constraints for the test samples coming from BTW (still think that is better to get rid of them if is not too difficult for BTWers), but I don't think adding them to the metadata documentation is a good idea, because having this properties with such constraints could be seen as something quite strange for outsiders (as they are not necessary for anything apart from the BTW compatibility). On the other hand, this could be opening a dangerous path: if we don't add them to the metadata documentation, are we going to accept any other properties or elements that are not part of the TS metadata? (e.g. proprietary elements or extensions from contributors) Regards, CI. ____________________ Carlos Iglesias Fundación CTIC Parque Científico-Tecnológico de Gijón 33203 - Gijón, Asturias, España teléfono: +34 984291212 fax: +34 984390612 email: carlos.iglesias@fundacionctic.org URL: http://www.fundacionctic.org
Received on Wednesday, 5 December 2007 14:24:09 UTC