- From: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2007 08:48:06 +0200
- To: Evangelos Vlachogiannis <evlach@aegean.gr>
- CC: public-wai-ert-tsdtf@w3.org
Hi Vangelis, Evangelos Vlachogiannis wrote: > > Hi all, > > Shadi Abou-Zahra wrote: >> >> Hi Christophe, >> >> >> Christophe Strobbe wrote: >>> >>> At 20:08 3/04/2007, Shadi Abou-Zahra wrote: >>>> After re-reading the checklist for content review, I wonder if we >>>> should say something about the usage of SpecName in the metadata. >>>> The SpecName technologies in there should really match the intention >>>> (or references) of the respective WCAG 2.0 Technique. >>>> >>>> Any objections? Any wording suggestions? >>> >>> I'm not sure I understand what you're getting at. >>> Is this related to the applicability section in the WCAG 2.0 >>> techniques and failures? I.e. do you mean that the content review >>> should check that technologies in the test sample (or at least the >>> technology in which the technique or failure can be highlighted) is >>> also in the applicability section? (Or rather the other way around?) >> >> For example, the test sample "sc1.3.1_l1_018" applies to (X)HTML. What >> happens if the SpecName attribute (wrongly) refers to CSS instead? >> This must be checked... > > I agree this is important to add. But I was wondering if this should go > under Structure Review (metadata) instead of Content review. Or, have we > already included that by "All titles, descriptions, and other required > fields are included and accurate"? Does "accurate" refers to syntax > validity or to the content? In case we refer to the content we probably > have already included that. (??) Structure review is a syntactical check that we hope to automate... > BTW just noticed a typo under Content review->consistent: technqiue(s) Thanks, fixed. Regards, Shadi -- Shadi Abou-Zahra Web Accessibility Specialist for Europe | Chair & Staff Contact for the Evaluation and Repair Tools WG | World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) http://www.w3.org/ | Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI), http://www.w3.org/WAI/ | WAI-TIES Project, http://www.w3.org/WAI/TIES/ | Evaluation and Repair Tools WG, http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/ | 2004, Route des Lucioles - 06560, Sophia-Antipolis - France | Voice: +33(0)4 92 38 50 64 Fax: +33(0)4 92 38 78 22 |
Received on Thursday, 5 April 2007 06:48:25 UTC