- From: Shane Anderson <shane@cpd2.usu.edu>
- Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 18:50:05 -0600
- To: public-wai-ert-tsdtf@w3.org
- Message-ID: <5143325e0610201750t62cbe5bcm2e39ae25901d205c@mail.gmail.com>
Hi A few simple questions / clarifications on the testCaseDescription tag: <testCaseDescription id="" xml:lang="en" xmlns="http://bentoweb.org/refs/TCDL2.0/" xmlns:btw="http://bentoweb.org/refs/TCDL2.0/" xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:html="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:earl="http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/EARL/nmg-strawman#" xsi:schemaLocation="http://bentoweb.org/refs/TCDL2.0/ http://bentoweb.org/refs/schemas/tcdl2.0.xsd http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ http://dublincore.org/schemas/xmls/qdc/2006/01/06/dc.xsd http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml http://www.w3.org/2004/07/xhtml/xhtml1-strict.xsd http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink http://bentoweb.org/refs/schemas/xlink.xsd" > Is there a pattern an author should follow when creating an id for our purposes in this work group? Currently the schema for TCDL exist at a BenToWeb address. Will this change to a W3C address once we have hammered out an acceptable product? I am assuming that there will be a W3C version of TCDL when we are finished. Shane WebAIM.org
Received on Saturday, 21 October 2006 00:50:44 UTC