- From: cstrobbe <Christophe.Strobbe@esat.kuleuven.be>
- Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 10:02:39 +0200
- To: public-wai-ert-tsdtf@w3.org
Hi Daniela, Quoting Daniela Ortner <Daniela.Ortner@jku.at>: > Yesterday evening I was working on the first samples to be discussed > in > today's telecon. > There are three questions that I couldn't solve: > > 1) Should the samples only be converted to TCDL2.0 or should they be > restricted to the elements used in the TSD TF? Only those used by the TSD TF. > 2) There has been a discussion about whether to use location > pointers > from EARL within the "location" element. > a) Has there already been a final decision? The "Specification and > Guide" [1] and the "Schema" [2] seem to be not inline. The EARL location pointers are listed, just above "The techniques Element Type" in the "Specification and Guide", and in the Schema. There are a few loose ends that need to be tied up, but the idea is that we use EARL pointers. > b) Shadi, could you give me an example of location pointers from > EARL? > E.g., how would the following line look like when using location > pointers from EARL? > <location line="17" column="9" > xpath="/:html/:body/:form/:div/:div[1]"/> I would expect the following, but I hope that ERT WG members correct me if I'm wrong: <location> <earl:xPath> <earl:expression rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/ XMLSchema#string">/:html/:body/:form/:div/:div[1]</earl:expression> </earl:xPath> <earl:lineCharLen> <earl:line>17</earl:line> <earl:char>9</earl:char> </earl:lineCharLen> </location> > > 3) Has there already been a decision regarding the constant values > for > "dc:creator" and "dc:rights"? Not yet ... > [1]: http://bentoweb.org/refs/TCDL2.0-20061010.html > [2]: http://bentoweb.org/refs/schemas/tcdl2.0.xsd > Best regards, Christophe Strobbe -- Christophe Strobbe K.U.Leuven - Departement of Electrical Engineering - Research Group on Document Architectures Kasteelpark Arenberg 10 - 3001 Leuven-Heverlee - BELGIUM tel: +32 16 32 85 51 http://www.docarch.be/ Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm
Received on Tuesday, 17 October 2006 08:02:52 UTC