Re: updated "usage document", please review

Hi,

Evangelos Vlachogiannis wrote:
> I think it is a good time to also raise an issue here regarding the 
> naming convention of "content" as I had described in [1] . Do you think 
> this is really an issue?

Yes, I agree that this is an issue. I was also wondering if there may be 
cases where there needs to be more than one "content" file to carry out 
a test. Hence, maybe the naming convention for the "content" files is 
not really required, the necessary files for a test are indicated in the 
metadata anyway. What do others think?

> [1]: 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert-tsdtf/2006Sep/0043.html

Regards,
   Shadi


-- 
Shadi Abou-Zahra     Web Accessibility Specialist for Europe |
Chair & Staff Contact for the Evaluation and Repair Tools WG |
World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)           http://www.w3.org/ |
Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI),   http://www.w3.org/WAI/ |
WAI-TIES Project,                http://www.w3.org/WAI/TIES/ |
Evaluation and Repair Tools WG,    http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/ |
2004, Route des Lucioles - 06560,  Sophia-Antipolis - France |
Voice: +33(0)4 92 38 50 64          Fax: +33(0)4 92 38 78 22 |

Received on Thursday, 9 November 2006 18:05:09 UTC