RE: sc2.5.1_l1_002 step 2: Structure review

Hi,

> > * all necessary files are valid in their use;
> > 
> > What is this suppose to mean? Are we talking about 
> > grammar validation?
> 
> Sometimes files will be intentionally invalid according to the formal 
> grammar so we can't say that all test files must be valid.
> 
> What would be a better wording? Maybe "no unintentional 
> validity errors" 
> as we did with broken links?

I think so.

> > Additionally there is a "requiredTests" element which 
> > is not part of the Metadata Vocabulary
> 
> Do we allow extra data in the metadata or not?

My memories are that we are not going to do it.


Regards,
 CI.

 
--------------------------------------

Carlos Iglesias

CTIC Foundation
Science and Technology Park of Gijón
33203 - Gijón, Asturias, Spain 

phone: +34 984291212
fax: +34 984390612
email: carlos.iglesias@fundacionctic.org
URL: http://www.fundacionctic.org