Updated: EOW2 TF: Agenda for 23 October Teleconference

Hi All,

Please see the updated agenda below for today's meeting.

Agenda:

1. [ROUGH DRAFT] Transitioning Web Sites from WCAG 1.0 to WCAG 2.0
An updated version of the "[ROUGH DRAFT] Transitioning Web Sites from
WCAG 1.0 to WCAG 2.0" document can be found at:
http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/transition1to2/transition1to2.

Requirements analysis for this document and how it fits within the
planned suite:
<http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/changelogs/cl-transition1to2 >

For discussion:

- Overall reactions?
- Overall content? Anything missing? Does it meet the requirements? How
does it work for target audiences?
- Overall organization? How does it flow?
- Section-by-section, is it covering the right information?
- Are examples sufficient to illustrate steps?
- Discussion around a suitable heading for section 3.

Please note that it's still a rough draft and not ready for detailed
wordingsmithing quite yet.

Many thanks, Henny

-----Original Message-----
From: public-wai-eo-wcag2tf-request@w3.org
[mailto:public-wai-eo-wcag2tf-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Shawn Henry
Sent: 20 October 2006 19:07
To: wcag2tf
Subject: EOW2 TF: Agenda for 23 October Teleconference


Dear EOWG WCAG 2.0 Materials Support Task Force Participants:

An agenda and calling logistics for our 23 October 2006 teleconference
follow.

Time:	5:30pm-7:30pm US Eastern / 21:30-23:30 UTC. For other time zones
see:
		http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meeting.html
Bridge:	+1.617.761.6200, conference code: 3692 ("EOW2")
IRC:	Channel: #eow2, server: irc.w3.org, port: 6665

Agenda:

1. [ROUGH DRAFT] Transitioning Web Sites from WCAG 1.0 to WCAG 2.0
<http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/transition1to2/transition1to2 >

EOWG discussed this on Friday. Henny will try to make more edits this
weekend and Monday morning. I'll send an e-mail when the updated version
is available online.

Requirements analysis for this document and how it fits within the
planned suite:
<http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/changelogs/cl-transition1to2 >

For discussion:
- Overall reactions?
- Overall content? Anything missing? Does it meet the requirements? How
does it work for target audiences?
- Overall organization? How does it flow?
- Section-by-section, is it covering the right information?
- Note that it's still a rough draft and not ready for detailed
wordingsmithing.

Regards,
~ Shawn






-- 
DISCLAIMER:

NOTICE: The information contained in this email and any attachments is 
confidential and may be privileged.  If you are not the intended 
recipient you should not use, disclose, distribute or copy any of the 
content of it or of any attachment; you are requested to notify the 
sender immediately of your receipt of the email and then to delete it 
and any attachments from your system.

RNIB endeavours to ensure that emails and any attachments generated by
its staff are free from viruses or other contaminants.  However, it 
cannot accept any responsibility for any  such which are transmitted.
We therefore recommend you scan all attachments.

Please note that the statements and views expressed in this email and 
any attachments are those of the author and do not necessarily represent
those of RNIB.

RNIB Registered Charity Number: 226227

Website: http://www.rnib.org.uk

Received on Monday, 23 October 2006 16:23:43 UTC