Transitioning Web Sites from WCAG 1.0 to WCAG 2.0

Hi All,

Attached is the latest version of the transitioning document for comment
in Monday's meeting. A couple of questions that would be good to cover
in the con call include:

1. Is the title of the document suitable?
2. Is there an alternative to "transitioning" that can be used in the
site i.e. updating, moving from, upgrading...
3. How are people feeling about the length?
4. How well does it accommodate for the target audience?

Many thanks, Henny

 

-- 
DISCLAIMER:

NOTICE: The information contained in this email and any attachments is 
confidential and may be privileged.  If you are not the intended 
recipient you should not use, disclose, distribute or copy any of the 
content of it or of any attachment; you are requested to notify the 
sender immediately of your receipt of the email and then to delete it 
and any attachments from your system.

RNIB endeavours to ensure that emails and any attachments generated by
its staff are free from viruses or other contaminants.  However, it 
cannot accept any responsibility for any  such which are transmitted.
We therefore recommend you scan all attachments.

Please note that the statements and views expressed in this email and 
any attachments are those of the author and do not necessarily represent
those of RNIB.

RNIB Registered Charity Number: 226227

Website: http://www.rnib.org.uk





This message has been scanned for viruses by BlackSpider MailControl - www.blackspider.com