- From: Shawn Henry <shawn@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2017 09:54:00 -0500
- To: Eric Eggert <ee@w3.org>, WSTF <public-wai-eo-site@w3.org>, alicia.frausto@gmail.com
- Cc: "Wise, Charlotte" <cwise@visa.com>
On 9/13/2017 9:42 AM, Eric Eggert wrote: > > > On 13 Sep 2017, at 16:35, Shawn Henry wrote: > >> On 9/13/2017 9:00 AM, Wise, Charlotte wrote: >>> From a usability standpoint, it would be good if we could be consistent in our patterns and I would recommend we try to do that. Why do we use two different models here? Is there a way we could change the secondary page design to accommodate a consistent pattern? >> >> I *strongly* support that - always have. :) >> >> (ftr, I was very hesitant about moving the In-Page Contents from the right side.) > > Can I also note that some pages currently have both, a context (same resource) and a content (in-page) navigation? This is the case in the tutorials, for example. When we talked about it waaaaaay back, the consensus seemed to be that we would drop the in-page navigation in such cases. > > While I am happy to keep in-page navigations, this means introducing yet another template very late in the process, which is sub-optimal. Or, be consistent with *one* template: * all pages have in-page navigation on the right, when applicable. * some pages have related navigation on the left. ~Shawn > > Best, Eric > >> >> ~Shawn >> >> >>> >>> Best, >>> Charlotte >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Shawn Henry [mailto:shawn@w3.org] >>> Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2017 4:38 PM >>> To: WSTF <public-wai-eo-site@w3.org>; Wise, Charlotte <cwise@visa.com> >>> Subject: Re: [ftr] usability testing tasks, questions, characteristics >>> >>> Hi Charlotte, a more specific issue below... >>> >>>> -------- Forwarded Message -------- >>>> Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2017 12:43:50 -0500 >>>> >>>> >>>> I took a first pass at some research questions and tasks (tweaked from earlier list) and participant demographics for the usability testing. All open for discussion, of course. >>>> >>>> Research questions: >>>> . How do people interact with the home page, and the sub-pages? Where does their focus go and pause? What do they click on? >>>> . Think-out-loud reactions to the visual design, content areas, nav, etc. >>>> . Is the all the navigation throughout clear, including what's available, where they are, where they've already been, where they can go next. Is the non-primary navigation clear, e.g., in-page navigation, related pages, etc. >>> >>> On some pages, the left nav links to related info on other pages. >>> On some pages, the left nav is in-page links. >>> >>> Do users get that? Is it confusing? Helpful? >>> >>> ~Shawn >>> >>> <snip rest of message> >>> > > > > -- > > Eric Eggert > Web Accessibility Specialist > Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) at World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) > >
Received on Wednesday, 13 September 2017 14:54:10 UTC