Re: [ftr] usability testing tasks, questions, characteristics

On 9/13/2017 9:00 AM, Wise, Charlotte wrote:
>  From a usability standpoint, it would be good if we could be consistent in our patterns and I would recommend we try to do that. Why do we use two different models here? Is there a way we could change the secondary page design to accommodate a consistent pattern?

I *strongly* support that - always have. :)

(ftr, I was very hesitant about moving the In-Page Contents from the right side.)

~Shawn


> 
> Best,
> Charlotte
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Shawn Henry [mailto:shawn@w3.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2017 4:38 PM
> To: WSTF <public-wai-eo-site@w3.org>; Wise, Charlotte <cwise@visa.com>
> Subject: Re: [ftr] usability testing tasks, questions, characteristics
> 
> Hi Charlotte, a more specific issue below...
> 
>> -------- Forwarded Message --------
>> Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2017 12:43:50 -0500
>>
>>
>> I took a first pass at some research questions and tasks (tweaked from earlier list) and participant demographics for the usability testing. All open for discussion, of course.
>>
>> Research questions:
>> .    How do people interact with the home page, and the sub-pages? Where does their focus go and pause? What do they click on?
>> .    Think-out-loud reactions to the visual design, content areas, nav, etc.
>> .    Is the all the navigation throughout clear, including what's available, where they are, where they've already been, where they can go next. Is the non-primary navigation clear, e.g., in-page navigation, related pages, etc.
> 
> On some pages, the left nav links to related info on other pages.
> On some pages, the left nav is in-page links.
> 
> Do users get that? Is it confusing? Helpful?
> 
> ~Shawn
> 
> <snip rest of message>
>

Received on Wednesday, 13 September 2017 14:35:41 UTC