- From: Pasquale Popolizio <pasquale@osservatoriosullacomunicazione.com>
- Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 22:22:55 +0200
- To: WSTF <public-wai-eo-site@w3.org>
- Cc: Shawn Henry <shawn@w3.org>
Hi Shawn, hi all. > 1. tagline justify: right > left I find it ok. > 2. tagline added (WAI): "Web Accessibility Initiative: > Strategies..." > "Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI): Strategies..." Maybe it's redundant; we have already: <h1>Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI)</h1> > 3. in navigation: W3C Home > W3C Home Page > 4. in navigation: Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI Home) > WAI > Home Page Maybe it's redundant. regards ciao pasquale Il giorno 28/giu/05, alle ore 18:12, Shawn Henry ha scritto: > > Henk & WSTF, > > I drafted up an alternative in reply to Henk's issues (below) > > http://www.w3.org/WAI/ut3/Overview-print.html > > has different: > 1. tagline justify: right > left > 2. tagline added (WAI): "Web Accessibility Initiative: > Strategies..." > "Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI): Strategies..." > 3. in navigation: W3C Home > W3C Home Page > 4. in navigation: Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI Home) > WAI > Home Page > > Note: please look at the wrapping and alignment in "common" and > different configurations with large and small resolution, font > size, magnification. > > Please reply as soon as possible with any specific reasons for or > against these changes, or simply a preference without support > (indicate strong or weak). :) > Best, > ~ Shawn > > > >>> The link 'W3C Home' is not clear, without hovering the mouse over >>> the word 'W3C Home' there is no format clue to know that this is >>> a link to the W3C homepage. It is even a bit strange as solitude >>> word on top of the navigation. >>> >> Yes, we know this is not ideal visual design. In the previous >> major design prototype that we did formal usability testing on >> (http://www.w3.org/WAI/ut2/gettingstarted.html), we had W3C Home >> within a darker box. That did poorly in testing as people clicked >> on it when they wanted to go back to the WAI home page. >> Do you have suggestions for easy fixes? Would adding "Page" to it >> be a big improvement (i.e., "W3C Home Page")? >> Or, do you think we can list this as an open issue and address it >> after the first release of the new site, rather than holding up >> the rollout of the new site to address it now? >> (WSTF, since we didn't get to this on the telecon, please comment >> on list.) >> >>> To me it is not clear to be on the Web Accessibility Initiative >>> web site. This is because of the fact that the word Web >>> Accessibility Initiative is rather small and is a part of a long >>> sentence. See my sample what I thought would be more clear. >>> (wai.png) >>> >> Yes, again we know this is not ideal visual design. We had >> different alignment in http://www.w3.org/WAI/ut2/ but that didn't >> do well with larger fonts. We had hoped to refine this visual >> design to have a different "treatment" of the "tagline"; however, >> we had chosen to move forward as is for the first release. >> Note that in usability testing of http://www.w3.org/WAI/ut2/ >> everyone easily identified the site. >> Do you think it enough for now that: >> - "Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) Home" is at the top of the >> navigation bar >> - there is an "About WAI" link on all pages >> - the "WAI" acronym is well known within Web accessibility >> community and most people coming to the site >> ? >> I think making the orange bar larger to accommodate larger test >> would make it too strong ascetically. Perhaps left aligning the >> text would help? >> If we don't come up with an easy solution, do you think we can >> list this as an open issue and address it after the first release >> of the new site, rather than holding up the rollout of the new >> site to address it now? >>
Received on Tuesday, 28 June 2005 20:23:01 UTC