- From: Andrew Arch <andrew.arch@nils.org.au>
- Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 09:38:28 +1100
- To: "'Shawn Henry'" <shawn@w3.org>, <public-wai-eo-site@w3.org>
- Cc: <michaeka@wellsfargo.com>
Out of the three that came late? - lower-arc1.png is my (poor) preference. The others are not smooth & don't seem to relate to the bridge. However, the mockup3.gif that Blossom sent separately appealed more than any of the PNG versions. Andrew -----Original Message----- From: Shawn Henry [mailto:shawn@w3.org] Sent: Thursday, 25 November 2004 10:53 AM To: michaeka@wellsfargo.com; 'Michael Lenz'; 'Andrew Arch'; carologic@gmail.com; 'Justin Zachary Thorp'; 'Charmane K. Corcoran' Cc: mcmay@w3.org Subject: FW: arc treatment - please reply ASAP Importance: High Not sure is this got through to the list Monday :( Please try to reply to the list and cc: me & blossom (without the attachments). Thanks! ~ shawn -----Original Message----- From: Shawn Henry [mailto:shawn@w3.org] Sent: Monday, November 22, 2004 9:36 PM To: public-wai-eo-site@w3.org Subject: arc treatment - please reply ASAP Importance: High The attached have an idea for arc treatments to the right column/boxes: * lower-arc.png has an offset arc at the bottom of a right column on the home page * subpage-floating.png has a symetrical arc at the top (and straight at the bottom) of the floating page contents box on the sub pages * subpage-floating-both.png has an offset arc at the top and bottom of the floating page contents box on the sub pages (Note: these are from the previous version (rather than the one from today), so ignore the other aspects.) These try to bring the curve of underneath the bridge down into the page. ... not sure I like either any of them or not ... not sure if the idea can be better implemented here &/or elsewhere... What do you think? PLEASE reply to the list ASAP as Blossom is revising Tuesday and Wednesday! ~ Shawn
Received on Sunday, 28 November 2004 23:33:36 UTC