- From: Carol at Kognitive.com <carol@kognitive.com>
- Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 12:16:58 -0600
- To: <public-wai-eo-site@w3.org>
You can now view this document and the detailed results at: http://www.kognitive.com/eowg/closedcardsort-results.htm I look forward to your comments/suggestions! Regards, Carol ----- Original Message ----- From: "Carol at Kognitive.com" <carol@kognitive.com> To: <public-wai-eo-site@w3.org> Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 10:11 AM Subject: WSTF: Card Sort Results > Here are the Closed Card Sort Results - my apologies for not getting these > out sooner - rough week. It also took much longer than I expected to go > through the results due to all of the anomalies. I tried doing a more > complex analysis, and got very unclear results, so I went back to doing it > the old fashioned way. I'm posting the actual spreadsheets on my website if > you want the gritty details - url forthcoming. > > If you have any questions or suggestions for further analysis please contact > me. > > Carol J. Smith > Kognitive Consulting, Inc. > Chicago, IL, USA > Cell: 773-218-6568 > carol@kognitive.com > > > WAI Web Site Task Force > > Closed Card Sort Results > > > > > > Participants Overview > > > > Female: 6 Male: 3 > > > > Known Member of W3C: 3 > > > > Other factors: 1 Non-native English Speaker > > 1 known sight-related disability > > 3 Participants known non-US citizens > > > > Pre-Test Questionnaire Results: > > > > · Occupations: > > o Researcher, Consultant > > o Section 508 Coordinator > > o Director Assistive Technology > > o Computer Access Specialist > > o Webmaster > > o Information Specialist at ADA Center > > o Sect 508 Tech Policy Analyst/Web Developer > > o Info Tech Prof - Web Accessibility Trainer > > o Web Developer > > > > · 7 out of 9 have Developed a Web page > > > > · All Participants are Familiar with a set of Web Accessibility > Guidelines > > > > · Participants Visits to the WAI Site in the past 3 months: > > Once: 4 Once a month: 2 > > None: 1 Once a week: 2 > > > > > > General Results > > > > See the Summary by Category Worksheet in the Excel Spreadsheet for general > overview. > > > > Overall many cards were consistently placed by over 50% (5) of the > participants. Here are those cards in the Category in which they were > placed: > > > > About WAI > > · About WAI > > · Participating in WAI > > · WAI Contacts > > · WAI Sponsorship > > > > Getting Started > > · Getting Started: Making a Web Site Accessible > > > > WAI Groups > > · Authoring Tools Accessibility Guidelines Working Group (ATWG) > > · Education and Outreach Working Group (EOWG) > > · Education and Outreach Working Group Email List Archives (EOWG) > > · User Agent Accessibility Guidelines Working Group (UAWG) > > · User Agent Accessibility Guidelines Working Group charter (UAWG) > > · User Agent Accessibility Guidelines Working Group Email List > Archives (UAWG) > > · WAI Interest Group > > · WAI Interest Group Charter > > · WAI Interest Group Email List Archives > > · Web Content Accessibility Guidelines Working Group (WCWG) > > · Web Content Accessibility Guidelines Working Group Charter (WCAG) > > · Web Content Accessibility Guidelines Working Group Email List > Archives (WCAG) > > > > Guidelines and Techniques > > · Authoring Tool Accessibility Guidelines 1.0 (ATAG) > > · Checklist for Authoring Tool Accessibility Guidelines 1.0 (ATAG) > > · Checklist for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0 (WCAG) > > · Checkpoints for User Agent Accessibility Guidelines 1.0 (UAAG) > > · Logos for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) > > · Techniques for Accessibility Evaluation and Repair > > · Techniques for Authoring Tool Accessibility Guidelines 1.0 (ATAG) > > · Techniques for User Agent Accessibility Guidelines 1.0 (UAAG) > > · Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0 (WCAG) > > · Translations of Authoring Tool Accessibility Guidelines (ATAG) > > · Translations of Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) > > · User Agent Accessibility Guidelines 1.0 (UAAG) > > · Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0 (WCAG) > > · XML Accessibility Guidelines > > > > Resources > > · Accessibility Features of Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) > > · Accessibility Improvements in HTML 4.0 > > · Alternative Web browsing > > · Developing Organizational Policies on Web Accessibility > > · Gallery of Accessible Sites > > · General links on Web Accessibility > > · Logos for Authoring Tool Accessibility Guidelines (ATAG) > > · Policies relating to Web Accessibility > > · Quick Tips > > · Selecting and Using Authoring Tools for Web Accessibility > > > > Events and Meetings > > · Calendar of Conferences > > · WAI Events > > > > > > Groupings > > > > Three participants spent the time to sort their cards into sub-groups. > Those results are in the Groupings Worksheet of the Excel Spreadsheet. > > > > Comments and Anomalies by Participant > > > > Multiple Participants added and removed categories, made comments during the > Closed Card Sort or there were issues with the sorting. Comments were > recorded by facilitators. > > > > · A common theme is the combining of Guidelines and Techniques and > Resources - we may possibly want to revisit this as an issue. > > > > · The renaming of Getting Started was discussed in the WSTF Face to > Face meeting at CSUN and it was tentatively decided that it would be renamed > Intro to Web Accessibility. > > > > > > Participant #1: Put Guidelines and Techniques into the Resources Category. > > Card #54 (Web Content Accessibility Guidelines Working Group (WCWG) was not > recorded. Facilitator comments: "This participant is very familiar with W3C > and that may have influenced her organization. > > > > Participant #2: Wanted to be sure to note that "WAI Resources" could also go > under the Resources category (participant placed it in the About WAI > section). > > Also that General FAQ's should be in each section, as should guidelines and > techniques, etc. She said it should be broken down by section. > > > > Participant #3: Removed Getting Started (commented that she "hates that > section"). In later discussion she said that she did not like the wording > of "Getting Started" because it was unclear. She did like the idea of > instead using "Introduction to Web Accessibility" or something similar > however. Participant first completely excluded the Archives of Email, then > put into groups with other group related cards. She felt archives belonged > somewhere else. Card #36 (Techniques for Authoring Tool Accessibility > Guidelines 1.0 (ATAG)) was not recorded. > > > > Participant #4: Removed the About WAI category. Added Working Groups > category. Put a general overview "Why Good" with a basic overview telling > how and FAQ's. Guidelines and Techniques he recommended Combining totally > or adding a section with all the overlaps and just separating the > differences (as in all that are similar). He would then put Working Groups > into Resources. When coming to the WAI site he would want to know: "Who can > I talk to?", "Who's done it?", "New Groups" and various other topics. > > > > Participant #5: All other cards subheading for home page (links). Not sure > what "Getting Started" means - newbies? All UAAG stuff together. Also > Guidelines and Techniques. The more ways to get somewhere the better - > cross linking. WAI Glossary placement is content dependent. WAI > definitions? Resources? Terms for Guideline and Techniques? Saw these cards > as being a bridge between Getting Started and Techniques. Organization, > structure, policy - bridge between policies/newbies and Tech, policy vs. > tech. Post-it note comments: right now on WAI pages - likes navigation on > left because scroll bar is there (tech person). Would put WAI Contacts on > WAI Groups in addition to WAI Contacts Category > > > > Participant #6: Added new category of "Education Training Outreach > Work-Sheeting kinda stuff" - she stated this was "Inter-mediary category > between Getting Started and Techniques." Comment on Resources Title: > "Confusing Category Usually Means links to outside info." Comments on > General links on Web Accessibility card: "Why do you need this card? Where > is this going to take me? Makes me think too much. What are the general > links - where will it take me that all the other's hasn't already taken me. > Suggest pitch" Card #8 (Checklist for Authoring Tool Accessibility > Guidelines 1.0 (ATAG)) was not recorded. > > > > Participant #7: Facilitator comment: "This person appears to have sorted > somewhat by their awareness of the organization." WCAG Member. Card #35 > (Techniques for Accessibility Evaluation and Repair) was not recorded. > > > > Participant #8: Combined Guidelines and Resources and Techniques into one > section called Guidelines, Resources and Techniques. Facilitator comments: > "I think we should take special note of Participant's home page comments, > particularly since she knows what it takes to teach people about web > accessibility." Participants' Proposed order of Categories: Home Page; > About WAI; Getting Started, Guidelines Resources and Techniques; Events and > Meetings; WAI Groups. > > > > Participant #9: Added FAQ's or FAQ's and Glossary Category. Should have > links to more specific FAQ's. Participant comments: What is "Resources? > Logos - Could go in either Resources or Guidelines and Technique. Re: WAI > Sponsorship - Who's Sponsoring Who? Placement of Policies relating to Web > Acc., Planning a Web Acc. Training, and Implementation Plan for Web Acc. > Have to have a policy, then training and implementation. Getting Started - > Maybe should be named something else. Re: Developing Org. Policies, > Implementation Plan, and Policies Relating to Web Acc. Either three > "sub-categories" of Getting Started, or place all of them in Getting > Started. Presenting the Case for Acc. And why Web Acc. Are maybe the same > thing; > > or Presenting the Case and Alternative Browsing are subsets of Why Web Acc. > Alternative Browsing is specific, also parallel to How People Use the Web > Standards Harmonization should be either on Home Page or Guidelines and > Techniques. More technical; need to know technologies; then can think > about standards. Facilitator comments: "Card Sorting was very thorough - he > placed almost all the cards deliberated over the ones he wasn't sure about > and then checked all his piles re-categorizing a few cards." Card 57 was > not categorized by participant (Why Standards Harmonization). >
Received on Monday, 29 March 2004 13:15:36 UTC