- From: <Andrew.Arch@visionaustralia.org.au>
- Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 15:45:34 +1100
- To: shawn@w3.org
- Cc: public-wai-eo-site@w3.org
Belated regrets for today's meeting - had to attend a "digital content and
web services" trade seminar this morning. Promise to be there next week
(but will be regrets again on Mar 29/30 and maybe Apr 5/6)
Sorry, Andrew
_________________________________
Dr Andrew Arch
Manager Online Accessibility Consulting
National Information & Library Service, Australia
Ph 613 9864 9222; Fax 613 9864 9210; Mobile 0438 755 565
http://www.nils.org.au/ | http://www.it-test.com.au/ |
http://www.ozewai.org/
Member, Education & Outreach Working Group,
W3C Web Accessibility Initiative
http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/
NILS - A Joint Venture between the
Royal Victorian Institute for the Blind, The Royal Blind Society of NSW,
and Vision Australia Foundation.
"Shawn Lawton Henry"
<shawn@w3.org> To: "'Carol at Kognitive.com'" <carol@kognitive.com>,
Sent by: <public-wai-eo-site@w3.org>
public-wai-eo-site-req cc:
uest@w3.org Subject: WSTF revised agenda for 15 March 2004
16/03/2004 08:12 AM
> From: Carol at Kognitive.com [mailto:carol@kognitive.com]
>
> I will need to miss the 2nd half of the call due to a board
> meeting I must attend.
We are shifting the order of the agenda to meet Carol's schedule, as
below:
REVISED WAI Site Task Force of EOWG (WSTF) Meeting Agenda for 15 March
2004
Time: 6:00pm-8:00pm US Eastern Time / 22:00-24:00 UTC
Bridge: +1.617.761.6200,
conference code 9783# (WSTF#)
IRC: channel: #wstf
server: irc.w3.org
port: 6665
Background reading:
- messages sent to list
- documents linked below
- issues in #5 below
Agenda:
1. Review material for card sorting (and other?) at CSUN
- please see information sent to list by Carol & others'
replies
2. Issues from Technical Plenary F2F meetings:
- http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/UCD/analysis-sum.html
a. vision:
- definitive resource - consider expanding to include "authoritative"
and "credible"
b. user groups:
- add "assistive technology developer" (probably under tool developers
category)
- suggestion to identify users in two categories: "technical
implementers" and XYZ (thoughts on that other group: "functional
implementers" or policy, management -type folks)
c. user groups & content list:
- request to define primary audience for each doc or group of content
(we previously questions whether that was worth the effort)
d. personas
- Andrew's concerns about personal information in personas
--- consistency issue, maybe less when have primary (perhaps take out of
others?)
--- pros & cons of explaining
--- put secondary, rather than first
--- (also change college > university)
- identify primary personas
e. tasks
- action item: spell check the list (and for grammar, eg. #7)
- new task? or already covered? or merge with another?: we contracted
out site development and required it to meet WCAG. how can i tell if it
does?
- new task?: how do people with various disabilities use computers and
Web sites?
- task 52 - add note about "not currently on WAI site"
- task 52 - add: what are the most important recommendations
3. Update on status, schedule, work plan
- Next Steps:
http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/UCD/Overview.html#tasks
4. Review action item status
- latest version sent to list
5. Discuss distributing draft usability testing results
===
Teleconference information:
- W3C Zakim Teleconference Bridge instructions:
http://www.w3.org/2002/01/UsingZakim
- Zakim IRC Bot information: http://www.w3.org/2001/12/zakim-irc-bot
- A source for help with IRC (Internet Relay Chat):
http://www.irchelp.org/
Received on Monday, 15 March 2004 23:47:54 UTC