- From: Shawn Lawton Henry <shawn@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 13:21:40 -0600
- To: "'Carol at Kognitive.com'" <carol@kognitive.com>, <public-wai-eo-site@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <000001c4079e$14f208d0$8c3fa842@SLHenry>
CS: Card Sorting and the f2f will make it worth it - but testing would be great! I guess I'm still unclear about next steps. It looks to me that we have the basics to be able to go ahead and create the wireframes to check tasks. Obviously we cannot check actual content or navigation or design, but I thought it would be nice to see if tasks are able to be done with the names we have chosen and if documents are "findable". SLH: Hum - maybe we are not so far off, after all. I am used to using wireframes to test navigation and basic design. However, it seems like what you are looking for is testing/validating information architecture through tasks in addition to closed card sort. Is that correct? Well, that I think is more do-able at this stage (provided you want to put in the work to get it set up in the next few days :-\. I think that rather than using "wireframes" that introduce design complication, you could use just a simple outline - that is, having just the main 6 categories on the first page, and the sub-categories on subsequent pages. (Remember that these all need to be in accessible formats, e.g., accessible HTML.) One issue is that I think there are some pages for the tasks that do not exist - wonder if you came across that when thinking through the tasks and pages to complete them? What do you (ALL) think? ~ shawn
Received on Thursday, 11 March 2004 14:22:08 UTC