- From: <michaeka@wellsfargo.com>
- Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 09:33:43 -0700
- To: mlenz@cisco.com, public-wai-eo-site@w3.org
Michael - I agree with your comments. Somehow I forgot the larger picture and was considering the WAI home page as the root. I am concerned that the WAI page be inviting and that content be clear, though I think we can make it so with inviting and clear design. Regards, Blossom _____________________________________ Blossom Michaeloff Web Research and Design Wells Fargo 415.222.3045 michaeka@wellsfargo.com -----Original Message----- From: public-wai-eo-site-request@w3.org [mailto:public-wai-eo-site-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Michael Lenz Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2004 4:38 PM To: 'WAI Website Redesign Taskforce' Subject: Re: another response to reply today: home page ready for EOWG I disagree with the W3C and WAI navigation entries not being needed. -The redesign is going to be leveraged by other initiatives in the W3C. It has the potential to become the standard UI and navigation system for several W3C sites. - WAI is a child of the W3C, we should make is easy for users to understand the relationship of WAI to the W3C and other sites. - We need to allow users to easy and consistently navigate up and down the hierarchy, giving a strong reason to have the same navigation system on the homepage. I want the redesign to be one piece of an entire navigational system. Not a one off to be used for just the WAI site. Just my take on things. -michael On Jun 23, 2004, at 12:55 PM, michaeka@wellsfargo.com wrote: > Attached is another draft of the WAI home page. The left column > includes the > same links as Shawn's draft, except for W3C Home and WAI home. They > are not > needed for this page. The third-level left nav links are all still > there and > easily available to power users, but they are also given context for > new > users.
Received on Thursday, 24 June 2004 12:34:57 UTC