- From: Carol at Kognitive.com <carol@kognitive.com>
- Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 16:12:15 -0500
- To: <public-wai-eo-site@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <013601c46855$9262e4c0$7900a8c0@VAIO>
My response to Charmane's questions: > * What are our standards for header usage? Do we need, for >example, a header "Introduction"? This intro doc has "Introduction" in the >title (H1), as the first H2), and in the first sentence of Charmane's draft >- overkill. I agree - I think the Title is enough. > * Is the title of the slide show "Online Overview of the Web >Accessibility Initiative" or "Overview of the Web Accessibility Initiative"? >I would vote for the latter, as it's obvious that it's online when viewed >over the Web, but could be offline when someone is using it for a >presentation. All our docs are online. I agree - remove "Online" > * Do we want to let people modify the slide show? We discussed allowing people to download the show - if they download it they should be able to alter it any way they please. > * Are there instances when we want to include the entire URI >with the link name? If so, when and what format? For example, Overview of >Web Accessibility <http://www.w3.org/Talks/WAI-Intro/overview.html> >(http://www.w3.org/Talks/WAI-Intro/Overview.html). My vote would be to not >include the links on the page (I don't think we do this now) and consider a >printer-friendly style that would include the links. If we do include the >URI, it should not be a live link: it would then be a redundant link for a >screen reader, as well as sounding like gibberish in a links list. I think if we are going to include links it would be best if they were live (despite the annoyance for screen readers). I like the idea of a printer-friendly style - however that would mean more upkeep. Carol J. Smith carol@kognitive.com
Received on Monday, 12 July 2004 17:20:22 UTC