- From: Shawn Lawton Henry <shawn@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2004 09:57:49 -0600
- To: <Andrew.Arch@visionaustralia.org.au>, "'WAI Website Redesign Taskforce'" <public-wai-eo-site@w3.org>
> From: Andrew.Arch@visionaustralia.org.au
>
> #1 ID 2 "Build Your Own Style Sheets"
> I had in mind something more akin to what the AFB
> (http://www.afb.org/myafb.asp) offers - pick and chose the
> settings that suit your needs.
Ah, OK. Then, I'd say leave in ID 2 and fix the description, and add in
the notes that link to AFb as an example.
Also, for ID 1 ("Alternative Sytle Sheets") can put in notes example:
"Select a Style Sheet (CSS)" at http://www.trace.wisc.edu/sitehelp/
> #2 ID [new] "Index"
> I think a good site map and a WAI search capacity are far
> more important than an alphabetical index. If we had a
> site-map, but no WAI search, I would still only rate this as
> low-medium.
ok with me.
i got the idea when looking at different categorizations of things,
e.g., having all the checklists under "C" and techiques under "T" - in
addition to site map categorization.
(note that WAI search might be complicated and have not yet figured out
the feasibility of getting that soon...)
> #3 Is it appropriate to also use this list for additional
> content I think this is a good place to capture this
> information (maybe a separate Excel tab?).
Received on Wednesday, 7 January 2004 10:58:41 UTC