- From: Shawn Lawton Henry <shawn@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2004 09:57:49 -0600
- To: <Andrew.Arch@visionaustralia.org.au>, "'WAI Website Redesign Taskforce'" <public-wai-eo-site@w3.org>
> From: Andrew.Arch@visionaustralia.org.au > > #1 ID 2 "Build Your Own Style Sheets" > I had in mind something more akin to what the AFB > (http://www.afb.org/myafb.asp) offers - pick and chose the > settings that suit your needs. Ah, OK. Then, I'd say leave in ID 2 and fix the description, and add in the notes that link to AFb as an example. Also, for ID 1 ("Alternative Sytle Sheets") can put in notes example: "Select a Style Sheet (CSS)" at http://www.trace.wisc.edu/sitehelp/ > #2 ID [new] "Index" > I think a good site map and a WAI search capacity are far > more important than an alphabetical index. If we had a > site-map, but no WAI search, I would still only rate this as > low-medium. ok with me. i got the idea when looking at different categorizations of things, e.g., having all the checklists under "C" and techiques under "T" - in addition to site map categorization. (note that WAI search might be complicated and have not yet figured out the feasibility of getting that soon...) > #3 Is it appropriate to also use this list for additional > content I think this is a good place to capture this > information (maybe a separate Excel tab?).
Received on Wednesday, 7 January 2004 10:58:41 UTC