- From: Shawn Lawton Henry <shawn@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2003 15:14:52 -0600
- To: <public-wai-eo-site@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <000201c3b850$29be07c0$a58ebc42@SLHenry>
Sailesh, Thanks for the thoughts! I think grouping tasks by effort required applies to the current design of the site. Perhaps when we redesign the site, something that once required several steps (such as determining how to make forms accessible) might be a more simple task that is only two clicks away from the home page. ~ Shawn -----Original Message----- From: public-wai-eo-site-request@w3.org [mailto:public-wai-eo-site-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Sailesh Panchang Sent: Friday, November 28, 2003 4:47 PM To: public-wai-eo-site@w3.org Subject: Grouping Usability Tasks Hello All, I was unfortunately not present at the mmeeting when this current grouping scheme was discussed. But I guess it has evolved out of the idea I proposed at an earlier meeting that the tasks be grouped under say three heads along the lines of : easy, intermediate level, and difficult . This again is as perceived by the working group. The grouping should have some relevance to the objective i.e. conducting usability testing, and certainly is not being done just for "chunking". So for instance, we might consider assigning one task from the simple, intermediate level and difficult tasks to each of the subjects. As Blossom pointed out, any one might need to do any of the tasks. And the individual might have little or a lot of tech knowledge and likewise little or a lot of accessibility knowledge. The grouping of tasks should not be based on the characteristics of the subjects. Finding info about WAI might be categorized as a relatively simple task as the info is perhaps a link away from the home page and all in one place. But determining how to make forms accessible is something that will take several steps and one might need to review more than a couple of pages: guidelines and checkpoints and techniques. One has to determine which checkpoints relate to forms to begin with, etc... so it is a fairly involved and time consuming task - for anyone regardless of background. So I suggest we consider the above grouping and have just 3 groups as the number of tasks too are less than 50-60. Sailesh Panchang Senior Accessibility Engineer Deque Systems,11180 Sunrise Valley Drive, 4th Floor, Reston VA 20191 Tel: 703-225-0380 Extension 105 E-mail: sailesh.panchang@deque.com Fax: 703-225-0387 * Look up <http://www.deque.com> * ----- Original Message ----- From: michaeka@wellsfargo.com To: public-wai-eo-site@w3.org Sent: Friday, November 28, 2003 4:58 PM Subject: Re: WSTF agenda for 1 Dec 2003 Hello, all - A note above the Task List posted November 28, 2003 (<http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/UCD/tasks>), comments that the headings "below are only to help 'chunk' the long list and the grouping under a certain heading is not important." - I agree 100% that we need to chunk the list. But, if the groupings under each heading are "not important," then the grouping is confusing. If something is grouped, I'm assuming that there is some meaning to the grouping. The way the list is currently grouped does not work for me very well. For example, I could have heavy technical knowledge and moderate Web accessibility knowledge, but still search for the definition of the term Web accessibility. For discussion on Monday, here's another grouping possibility: GENERAL ACCESSIBILITY 1. I am trying to find the definition of the term Web accessibility. 2. I need info to help convince self, boss, org, or other that Web accessibility is important and that we should be doing it. 3. I want to find out about Web access policies around the world. 4. My boss told me to make our Web site accessible and I need to know where to start. 5. I want a simple checklist of what I (content developer) need to do for Web accessibility. 6. I am doing a presentation on accessibility and want to order Quick Tips to hand out. 7. I am doing training on general accessibility information and trying to find materials for my presentation. 8. I want to find a list of all the guidelines WAI has published. SPECIFIC QUESTIONS AND SEARCHES 1. I have been asked how much time and money it would take to make your Web site accessible. 2. I am trying to find a specific document. ["How People with Disabilities Use the Web", "Policies Relating to Web Accessibility", etc.] . 3. I want statistics on disability to help make a business case for Web accessibility. [deliberately not on site or in resource in the foreseeable future] 4. I've searched for XYZ in a search engine [that dumped me in the middle of a resource] 5. I am trying to find the list of Web accessibility evaluation tools. 6. I have a specific question on Web accessibility that I want to ask WAI (e.g., interpretation of a guideline). TECHNIQUES 1. I heard XYZ [text resizing] is important for accessibility and want to find out why. 2. I heard that Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) helps with accessibility; I want to know why CSS is good for accessibility and get an intro on CSS. 3. Someone gave me a report generated by a Web evaluation tool, and I need to look up details about some of the things it said needed human evaluation. 4. Someone gave me a report generated by a Web evaluation tool, and I don't understand how to fix some of the things it identified as errors. 5. I am looking for a document that explains the techniques to implement Check point #X. 6. I am doing a new thing [data tables, forms, etc.] and I want to make it accessible. WAI 1. I want to know more about WAI in general. How long has it been around? How is it funded? Who is on the staff? 2. I heard W3C WAI was open to outside participation and I want to help out. 3. I am a member of a WAI WG and I am trying to find out when the next meeting is. When is that in your time working zone? Regards, Blossom _____________________________________ Blossom Michaeloff Web Research and Design Wells Fargo 415.222.3045 michaeka@wellsfargo.com
Received on Monday, 1 December 2003 16:14:58 UTC