- From: Thomas Jewett <jewett@csulb.edu>
- Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 07:46:56 -0700
- To: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
- Cc: public-wai-eo-badtf@w3.org
Agreed -- this gets it rolling -- template analysis to follow (it's pretty short). Thanks. Tom On Fri, 22 May 2009 11:08:13 +0200 Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org> wrote: > Hi Tom, > > Thomas Jewett wrote: >> Hi, Shadi/all -- >> >> Trying to think of a reasonably efficient way to >>document >> what will have to be a line-by-line analysis of the >>code. >> I could simply add comments to a copy where they apply, >> for example: >> >> <!-- SC1.3.1, G115, G140, H42 --> <h1> > > It will be difficult to extract this information from >the HTML. I'd prefer that you do the opposite: copy the >code line into your report. For instance: > > # SC 1.3.1 > - H42: <h1>some text</h1> > - H42: <h2>another text</h2> > - G115: ... > > >> Which brings up some questions: >> >> - Should I do this for every occurrence, e.g., all <h2>s >>etc.? > > Yes, please. I know it is a lot of work but necessary to >be sure. > > >> - Should the comment be on the same line as the >>occurrence >> or before it? (I'm worried about connecting the report >>to >> the final line numbers in the code.) > > As above, copy the code rather than the line numbers. > > >> - Are just the SC/G/H numbers sufficient for this pass, >>or >> should I try to include all of the associated text and >>links >> here? > > The numbers are sufficient, I'll search and replace the >text and links. > > >> - And most importantly, is this strategy useable for >>doing the >> annotations and formatting the actual report? > > Don't think so. Please disregard the annotations for >now. Once we have the complete report we can then select >specific ones for annotations. > > >> Thanks for any ideas, > > Thanks for working on this! Please pass along a first >iteration of the report (the template page only for now) >rather than waiting until the end to get feedback. > > Best, > Shadi > > >> On Wed, 20 May 2009 18:29:36 +0200 >> Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org> wrote: >>> Hi Tom, >>> >>> As discussed, please start a WCAG 2.0 conformance >>>analysis of the >>> following pages: >>> - >>><http://www.w3.org/WAI/demos/bad/draft/2009/after/template/> >>> - >>><http://www.w3.org/WAI/demos/bad/draft/2009/after/home/> >>> - >>><http://www.w3.org/WAI/demos/bad/draft/2009/after/news/> >>> - >>><http://www.w3.org/WAI/demos/bad/draft/2009/after/tickets/> >>> >>> Regards, >>> Shadi >>> >>> -- >>> Shadi Abou-Zahra - http://www.w3.org/People/shadi/ | >>> WAI International Program Office Activity Lead | >>> W3C Evaluation & Repair Tools Working Group Chair | >> >> > > -- > Shadi Abou-Zahra - http://www.w3.org/People/shadi/ | > WAI International Program Office Activity Lead | > W3C Evaluation & Repair Tools Working Group Chair |
Received on Friday, 22 May 2009 14:47:46 UTC