- From: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 03 May 2009 16:29:50 +0200
- To: Thomas Jewett <jewett@csulb.edu>
- CC: public-wai-eo-badtf@w3.org
Hi Tom, Sorry for the late response, please find some comments below: Thomas Jewett wrote: > Hi, Shadi -- > > Thinking about doing some sort of an evaluation report, > I posted my paper for HCII, which talks about what we've > been doing here over the past few years. > > [@@@removed@@@] Neat paper, a real interesting read! Looking forward to this presentation in July... > It's not linked from anywhere, partially because it's in > non-accessible pdf as required by the conference, and > partially because I can't remember what the Springer > copyright allows. Uhm, now it *is* linked. Remember, this mailing list is publicly archived! Please make sure you are OK with this. > More relevant is my current version, which I will show > briefly in my talk; it's at > > http://www.theenabledweb.com/smart-analysis.html > > Also see the "Change view of this page" box and click on > the "Web: add 508/WCAG" version to see how I've connected > these with the protocol. > > I realize that this specific method is too proprietary in > its use of Jon's toolbar, but I'm wondering if we could > think of a way to accomplish something similar for the > "before" report. Let me know what you think... The principle idea is the approach that we tried to take in the current report [1]. If you look carefully, you will see that it follows the WAI "Template for Accessibility Evaluation Reports" [2], which is part of the WAI "Evaluating Web Sites for Accessibility" suite [3]: - <http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/2005/Demo/report/> - <http://www.w3.org/WAI/eval/template> - <http://www.w3.org/WAI/eval/> However, developing such an elaborate evaluation report is very tough. During the last teleconference call we discussed providing the results only, rather than the full report. This would be roughly section 4 of the current report: - <http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/2005/Demo/report/#results> Note: we plan to update the entire evaluation suite (possibly to have more detailed evaluation guidance) for WCAG 2.0 but that is a separate project to BAD. Does that address your question? Regards, Shadi -- Shadi Abou-Zahra - http://www.w3.org/People/shadi/ | WAI International Program Office Activity Lead | W3C Evaluation & Repair Tools Working Group Chair |
Received on Sunday, 3 May 2009 14:41:35 UTC