- From: Thomas Jewett <jewett@csulb.edu>
- Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 06:59:59 -0800
- To: Michael Stenitzer <stenitzer@wienfluss.net>, public-wai-eo-badtf@w3.org
This looks great! One question for discussion -- do we want to keep the link border on the icons? Possible good: indicates clickability; possible bad: visually distracting. Talk to you soon, Tom On Wed, 10 Dec 2008 10:03:05 +0100 Michael Stenitzer <stenitzer@wienfluss.net> wrote: > > on behalf of jan sjoerd i uploaded the new version of >the in-between page and the icons. > > http://www.wienfluss.net/BAD/inbetween/inbetween_after.html > http://www.wienfluss.net/BAD/icons/?glob=* > > find his comments below (he still has no access to the >list ;-() > > /michael > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >From: J.S. Poorta <jspoorta@gmail.com> > Date: Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 1:20 AM > Subject: in-between pages > To: BAD TF <public-wai-eo-badtf@w3.org> > > > Hi all, > > I believe to have processed the comments to the >in-between pages during our > last call in this update. > > Now we have two icons for the after pages (ok.png and >info.png) and two for > the before pages (warning.png and notok.png). They are >smaller (16x16). The > info icon was discussed to be obviously distinct from >the remaining visual > design, so I tried to make the other icons fit this one. > > See the inbetween.zip file for an in-between after page. >When hovered over > an annotation-icon the title of the annotation will >appear. To jump to the > detailed explanation activate the link. > Does this implementation reflect what everyone has in >mind? > > Comments are welcome. > Regards, > Jan Sjoerd > > > -- > Michael Stenitzer | WIENFLUSS >information.design.solutions > www.wienfluss.net | proschkogasse 1/5 | wien06at > fon ++43 650 9358770 | fax ++43 1 23680199 >
Received on Wednesday, 10 December 2008 15:00:36 UTC