Re: Accessibility evaluation for "after" template page

Yes, certainly for discussion. Let's wait for the findings from Steve then discuss next week. How are people available on Tuesday 14 February?

Cheers,
  Shadi


Liam McGee wrote:
> Pasquale Popolizio wrote:
>>
>> Hi Shadi,
>> no problem ;-))
>>
>>
>> checkpoint 1.1
>> - images like bear, violin and brain are only in CSS background; if a 
>> user has CSS disabled there's no way to see them. There are no "alt" 
>> attributes for these images.
>>
>> Maybe we could put these images in normal HTML with "alt".
>> checkpoint 6.1
>> - same problems, like above, about content images.
> 
> Hi guys -- I didn't regard these images as content as such, they add no 
> semantic information, just visual info, so I intentionally separated 
> them out from the content. One to discuss, I guess.
> 

-- 
Shadi Abou-Zahra     Web Accessibility Specialist for Europe | 
Chair & Staff Contact for the Evaluation and Repair Tools WG | 
World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)           http://www.w3.org/ | 
Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI),   http://www.w3.org/WAI/ | 
WAI-TIES Project,                http://www.w3.org/WAI/TIES/ | 
Evaluation and Repair Tools WG,    http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/ | 
2004, Route des Lucioles - 06560,  Sophia-Antipolis - France | 
Voice: +33(0)4 92 38 50 64          Fax: +33(0)4 92 38 78 22 | 

Received on Thursday, 9 February 2006 17:25:08 UTC